As of January 1, 2016, all new residential mortgages will REQUIRE that mandatory flood insurance is escrowed with your loan. More efforts to control what you do with your money and where it goes. This new rule is for any new loans starting in 2016 or any existing loans that experience a triggering event (loan extension, refi, etc.).
Below are some of the specifics, and a link to a FDIC pdf, but if you’re tired of being required to carry flood insurance let us perform a free flood zone audit for you to see if we can get you removed and end all of control.
Last week, federal regulators issued long-awaited flood regulations implementing the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012(“Biggert-Waters”) and Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (“HFIAA”). To those following the legislative and regulatory developments for federally mandated flood insurance, there won’t be any big surprises in the final rule. Indeed, in both Biggert-Waters and HFIAA, Congress prescribed relatively clear and specific requirements; thus, in responding to comments, the agencies were largely able to rely on statutory language to shape the new obligations. In a few instances, the agencies added clarity through new definitions or additional explanations, but largely the agencies followed the statutes’ road map.
Notable changes established in the rule include:
- For all new loans secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home or ones that experience a “triggering event” (making, increasing, renewing or extending the loan) after January 1, 2016, a lender must escrow all premiums and fees for flood insurance, subject to certain exceptions. This is a major change from the prior flood insurance regulations, which required escrowing those amounts only if the lender also required the escrow of other amounts (usually for taxes or insurance).
- “Small lenders” are exempt from this requirement, so lenders that have total assets of less than $1 billion on December 31 of either of the two prior years, as measured each year, subject to certain exceptions. For example, if a lender, as of July 6, 2012, had a policy of consistently and uniformly requiring the escrow of taxes, insurance premiums, fees or other charges, the lender is not eligible for the small lender exception.
- Certain loans are also exempt from this requirement, including: (i) loans extended primarily for business, commercial or agricultural purposes; (ii) loans in a subordinate position to a lien on the same property that is adequately covered; (iii) loans secured by properties that are already covered by a blanket condo, co-op, HOA or similar group policy; (iv) HELOCs; (v) nonperforming loans (90 days or more past due and remaining nonperforming until they are permanently modified, or the entire amount past due is collected or discharged); and (vi) loans with terms less than 12 months.
- The regulators reiterate that receipt of a loan application is not a “triggering event.” So, for example, if a regulated lender accepts a loan application in December 2015 but expects the loan to close in January, the escrow requirements will apply.
- Relatedly, for loans secured by residential improved real estate or a mobile home that are outstanding on January 1, 2016, a lender must give the borrower the option to escrow flood insurance premiums, subject to the same exceptions outlined above.
- The option to escrow also does not apply to the extent the requirement to escrow above is in effect. Therefore, this option only applies to those outstanding loans where there has been no “triggering event.”
- Regulated lending institutions must mail or deliver information to borrowers about the option to escrow by June 30, 2016.
- A lender may charge the borrower for the costs of forced-placed coverage beginning on the date on which the borrower’s previous coverage lapsed or did not provide sufficient coverage. A lender must terminate any force-placed insurance within 30 days of receipt of confirmation of sufficient existing coverage, and must refund to the borrower any premium and related fees charged during overlapping coverage. This may require lenders to bear the costs of some force-placed insurance related to periods when the borrower has sufficient insurance but force-placed coverage is also in effect.
- A borrower can demonstrate sufficient coverage by providing a declarations page that includes the existing flood insurance policy number and the identity of and contact information for the insurance company or its agent.
- Unlike in the context of escrows accounts established for hazard insurance under Regulation X, a regulated lender has no obligation under federal flood law to advance funds to pay for mandatory flood insurance premiums in lieu of force-placing insurance.
- Exempt from the mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements is any structure on a residential property that is detached from the primary residential structure and that does not serve as a residence. This exemption applies to multifamily properties as well, so detached maintenance sheds on multifamily residential properties, for example, are not required to be covered by flood insurance.
- The agencies have included in each “Appendix A” a revised Notice of Special Flood Hazards form designed to comply with new notice requirements, effective October 1, 2015.
The final rule’s escrow and option-to-escrow provisions become effective January 1, 2016, while the force-placed insurance provisions and certain notice requirements become effective October 1, 2015. Although Biggert-Waters requires rulemaking that will direct lending institutions to accept private flood insurance, the agencies opted to address this topic in a separate, forthcoming rulemaking.
Reach out if you ever have any questions.
6 thoughts on “New Flood Insurance Escrow Requirements!”
I’m currently been approved to refinance with Chase. They are including an escrow account for flood insurance. At the time of application, I showed
the declarations page and that it was paid for the year; however they are including it and I’m unable to get an answer from my contact, other than it is required. Upon searching, I found this article. Is this a bank requirement or a specific law? thank you
Honestly I would have to know more about the specific situation in escrow but it sounds as is you had flood insurance already and then they came back with their own force-placed policy. Albeit there could be some legitimate reasons for this such as not meeting their coverage requirements it is a bit irregular and I’d absolutely reach out to us with the “Free Flood Zone Audit” to see if there is anything we can do.
my lender does not require me to escrow my home owners insurance or taxes(taxes are exempt because I’am 100% disabled veteran) and i pay no taxes so why and is it manutory for lender to excrow my flood insurance Please let me know
Honestly, I’d love to see our team take a look at the flood insurance to see if we can help. Can’t speak for why they choose to mandate it on everyone, but I will say that even Government Buildings have flood insurance policies on them if they are in the High Risk, SFHA Flood Zones. Doesn’t make it any more pleasant to pay though
If a borrower gets the required amount of flood insurance but then also purchases additional flood insurance. Does the Bank have to Escrow the additional flood insurance premiums the same as they do for the required flood insurance premiums. The additional flood insurance is completely under the borrowers control as to whether they want to keep it or not.
Technically it does not have to escrow the excess coverage, but it can and will give you anywhere between 30-60 Days usually to provide proof of renewal. If you have a mortgage on a residential home worth $350,000, an NFIP Policy will only cover $250,000 for the building and you will be responsible for the other $100,000 in coverage. If you don’t find something or provide proof of renewal they will force-place a flood policy themselves. We would advise talking to an insurance agent or coming and consulting with us before even coming close to them force-placing you.